Day 4 (6/11) – Weather Update 2

photo (19)

First of all… the Badlands are awesome!!! I definitely want to make it back to the Badlands eventually. It is really unique and really really cool. We would have spent time hiking through the park had it not been for a tornado threat!!!!

It’s sort of an odd feeling severe weather day compared to what I’m used to. Dew points are in the low 60s (which is fairly high for the Black Hills) and a gusty easterly upslope flow has brought in a solid deck of stratocumulus trapped under the elevated mixed layer. Check out the special 20z weather balloon launch in Rapid City and you can see the shallow batch of moisture under the inversion.

RAP (1)

 

The easterly boundary layer flow underneath strong southwesterly winds aloft results in a really strongly sheared atmosphere. SPC mesoanalysis pegs mixed layer CAPE values near 3000 j/kg to our southwest.

mlcp

Continued moisture advection and QG forcing (lift) from an upper level disturbance swinging east from the Rockies will break the cap and we’ll get some nice storms to form. While the storms will initially be discrete (and possibly tornadic given the shear) they should quickly morph into a cluster and may even become a derecho across southern South Dakota and northern Nebraska.

SAT_WRG2_VIS

 

For now we’re going to wait a bit in Rapid City and figure out where to chase from there. We may wind up heading south on Rt 79 a bit and attack these things from the south. Should be a very busy afternoon after a trip full of blue sky!

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Day 4 (6/11) – Weather Update 2

  1. I have a question for this community:

    I am bemused by the notion of an elevated mixing level. The skew-t in Ryan’s post shows that the elevated mixing layer is not only warmer than the air below it, but a heluva lot drier. Now dry air is MORE dense that moist air. So, if the elevated layer were not warmer than their below it, it presumably would descend. So, the fact that it is still up there must have to do with the fact that its relative warmth balances its relative dryness, because, according to me, anyway, AIR THAT IS MORE DENSE CAN NEVER OVER RUN AIR THAT IS LESS DENSE.

    This, is where meteorologists start throwing things at me, insisting that airmasses of different characteristics do not mix. . They seem to be saying that , even if that dry air mass were more dense than the air it overlies, some force, some membrane, some skyhook would prevent it’s falling to the surface.

    This is what I need help with.
    Nick

  2. You’re too far west – if only you were in Iowa or Illinois right now. Fingers crossed you get to see some action on your chase of the weather variety of course 😉

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s